What happens when you have too few people in control of knowledge and science?
Particularly, peer review of scientific data, which proves the point of a life saving treatment, but is hindered repeatedly without good cause, to the point of immorality? For just
You get this mess, where #BigTech and #BigPharma are in charge of, or able to completely hinder the release of, extremely helpful and inexpensive treatments for the current #pandemic.
There can be no other conclusion but #Corruption and #Greed of the system, as even complete #Ineptitude or a #Broken system have had a full year to get a clue, and have not. Even the dimmest and most incompetent boobs have had enough evidence consistently pointing in 1 direction to guide them to the light, as it were.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/marshallshepherd/2016/11/22/9-tips-for-communicating-science-to-people-who-are-not-scientists/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Maturity and Civility expected. There is no such thing as a dumb question. Never let peer pressure keep you from learning. If one cannot resist attempting to insult someone, it must be witty AND entertaining, as you are gambling your ability to comment on whether *I* agree that it IS. And remember, this is a two-way street, so don't dish it out if you are unable to receive it in kind. For those who speak before thinking, as the most brilliant often do, remember what Mother said, "If you CAN'T say anything Nice, DON'T say anything at ALL." Most true Wisdom is timeless.